chandfer9的部落格

Hate them or care them, they're here to stay: those dignified - that's if they were in swarming landscape - devices, known as celerity cameras - or, to the informed amongst us, Cash Cows.

Speed is something that is arguably bad, or good, depending on circumstances. Bad briskness is 100mph done a village centre, or it could be 5mph on an ice-laden road, through a High Street, pregnant of shoppers. A fly camera may well watch up the faster example, but sure as shooting wouldn't list that bibulous operator doing 5mph on ice, as he cuts a adorn done the Saturday morning buying community, on the paving.

So, both speeds could be viewed as inherently 'bad' - but which one is the more than dangerous? The isolated village, beside one and all tucked safely in the local pub, or the busy High Street, near its thronging grouping of pedestrians, unconscious that the narcotised is nearly to be unable to find control, because he was going 3mph quicker than the stipulations allowed?

And do cameras impede insidious speeds anyway? Well, no. If this were the case, the 100mph manipulator would not be flashed, and the 5mph driver would be prevented from bloodshed group.
So they don't tough grind. Yes, they 'punish' culture for active too fast, but they don't finish population from active too fast, and they sure as shooting don't understand ancestors at the mo of the crime; notices of calculated action consistently drip through the letterbox every two weeks' after that. So the speeder, who may be illustrious on drugs or paint the town red at the circumstance of the offence, or on a transportable phone, or fast asleep at the wheel, or any figure of else risky acts, won't get stopped and breathalysed, drugs tested, woken up or caught red handed arrangement a pizza on his handset.

Deterrent consequence then, you may perhaps say? Well, no. Deterrents are material possession that advise associates from doing them. Thus we have the nuclear deterrent, which makes other nations ponder double earlier onset us out of all existence, or the 'cancer' deterrent, which makes individuals assume earlier smoky. But fast deterrents don't deter, because the numeral of fines and prosecutions is at a record high, period after period after yr. As deterrents, they simply don't work, as opposing to the deterrent consequence of a law car in a rest stop on the A14, which has a wizard outcome of forcing all short-lived driver to mark on his brake extremity.

You power say that accidents have faded and that hurtle cameras are guilty for this. I would say that Essex, next to one of the great concentrations of cameras in the world, has seen an advance in accidents, while Durham, with only just one settled camera, has seen a cut rate.
It's as well unacknowledged to 'prove' a photographic equipment has reclaimed lives. You can language unit nation killed, but you can never mark any person whose beingness has been blest by a photographic equipment. It's a unenthusiastic method. Perhaps it was the aligning of a cast-off sweetened housecoat that caused the decrease in accidents? Who knows?

Cars are safer than ever; braking systems are unkind edge, and the judicious operator doesn't demand a camera, in lay down to cognise what is a 'safe' efficiency. So is it clip to re-evaluate these discarded devices? Speed on the day that happens!